Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nicole Mattingly's avatar

I love this topic and the suggestions! I have one comment and one question.

Comment: I am really trying to follow these suggestions, but have struggled while writing. The first intentionally non-gendered language academic paper I wrote for a doctoral class was an analysis of a text (that I had a number of concerns about at took issue with). Weirdly, the critique sounded MEANER because I excluded he/she and reduced the use of "they" by referring to the author of the text by their last name or the title "the author." Example: "Smith's use of colloquial language makes the author's assertions feel less academic and data-driven." Not terrible in one sentence, but after a few pages of constantly using the "Smith" & "the author" it sounded like I was attacking the individual. As an experiment, I did a find & replace within the document replacing "Smith" with "they" and the text sounded much less judgmental in tone. I don't know how to overcome this... I ended up sort of alternating between Smith, the author, and they; but the professor still commented that I really sounded like I was "going after" Smith and I must REALLY hate them. Sigh.... Of course, I really didn't like the book so it wasn't just the language that sounded abrasive... hmmm.....

Question: When I greet or interact with strangers, I've ALWAYS used honorifics as a way to convey respect. Example: Store checker asks me If I'm having a good day and I reply, "Yes Sir! How's your day going?" But I haven't found a non-gendered honorific to replace "Sir" or "Ma'am" that imparts respect (accords the other party superior status). I've tried Ian McKellan's suggestion of just using "Love" in all circumstances ("Yes, Love"); but because I'm not an elderly, openly gay Englishman, the grocery checkers give me weird looks (Not exaggerating-LOL). If they have a title (like "Professor" or "Doctor") I'll use that term, but I struggle with strangers of unidentified "status." I'm trying to eliminate the honorific altogether if the other party is not CLEARLY Male-presenting or Female-presenting; but by dropping it altogether I feel like I'm not communicating the respect I intend to convey. Any other suggestions for non-gendered honorifics that still convey respectful acknowledgment of status?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts